<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: It takes time to arrive at simple,elegant solutions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://inspire99.com/it-often-takes-time-to-arrive-at-simple-elegant-solutions-startup-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://inspire99.com/it-often-takes-time-to-arrive-at-simple-elegant-solutions-startup-101/</link>
	<description>Startup and Motivation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:16:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SF		</title>
		<link>https://inspire99.com/it-often-takes-time-to-arrive-at-simple-elegant-solutions-startup-101/#comment-14055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 07:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://inspire99.com/?p=13176#comment-14055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://inspire99.com/it-often-takes-time-to-arrive-at-simple-elegant-solutions-startup-101/#comment-14054&quot;&gt;Vinay Nagaraju&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks a Vinay, well done for keeping the blog going. This triggered me to check a small social enterprise I helped set up in the early 90’s it’s still there! No bigger but still doing it’s stuff. Most of the projects I’ve developed over the years have morphed into different things or no longer exist. Not surprising, partly as their objective is individual or community change. S]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://inspire99.com/it-often-takes-time-to-arrive-at-simple-elegant-solutions-startup-101/#comment-14054">Vinay Nagaraju</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks a Vinay, well done for keeping the blog going. This triggered me to check a small social enterprise I helped set up in the early 90’s it’s still there! No bigger but still doing it’s stuff. Most of the projects I’ve developed over the years have morphed into different things or no longer exist. Not surprising, partly as their objective is individual or community change. S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vinay Nagaraju		</title>
		<link>https://inspire99.com/it-often-takes-time-to-arrive-at-simple-elegant-solutions-startup-101/#comment-14054</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vinay Nagaraju]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 07:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://inspire99.com/?p=13176#comment-14054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://inspire99.com/it-often-takes-time-to-arrive-at-simple-elegant-solutions-startup-101/#comment-14053&quot;&gt;SF&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you Steve, it is such a delight to hear from you and your experience. Having switched over to writing about startups, business - I was wondering if my posts were touching a similar wavelength, this is indeed a huge boost to have these thoughts from you... 

I can only imagine the challenge with those two sectors- not usually the first ones to adapt to change and respond quick. I sometimes feel that the amount of paperwork involved in getting things moving stands in the way of completing things. A common strand that&#039;s very interesting is the impact of time and feedback on the projects that are undertaken. Time and again, things change so much that it is impossible to plan for all scenarios and even if we do that, we tend to miss something or the other. 

The last few years of mine have been working with startups and some mid size companies which were customers. The number of times I have replanned a proposal made me feel that the deal was running away from happening. And funny enough, none of the deals which took so much of planning and over engineering happened, it ended up becoming a red tape exercise which did not yield desirable returns. I suppose that is hard in a startup where we are trying to do everything reasonably possible to get a deal and even though it takes enormous planning time, we still keep working on it with a faint hope which statistically yields very low results. Having said that, startups and stats don&#039;t seem to marry very well too :) ..

Thanks so much for your thoughts above, I am sure it will add a wealth of experience for the readers in this discussion :) ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://inspire99.com/it-often-takes-time-to-arrive-at-simple-elegant-solutions-startup-101/#comment-14053">SF</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you Steve, it is such a delight to hear from you and your experience. Having switched over to writing about startups, business &#8211; I was wondering if my posts were touching a similar wavelength, this is indeed a huge boost to have these thoughts from you&#8230; </p>
<p>I can only imagine the challenge with those two sectors- not usually the first ones to adapt to change and respond quick. I sometimes feel that the amount of paperwork involved in getting things moving stands in the way of completing things. A common strand that&#8217;s very interesting is the impact of time and feedback on the projects that are undertaken. Time and again, things change so much that it is impossible to plan for all scenarios and even if we do that, we tend to miss something or the other. </p>
<p>The last few years of mine have been working with startups and some mid size companies which were customers. The number of times I have replanned a proposal made me feel that the deal was running away from happening. And funny enough, none of the deals which took so much of planning and over engineering happened, it ended up becoming a red tape exercise which did not yield desirable returns. I suppose that is hard in a startup where we are trying to do everything reasonably possible to get a deal and even though it takes enormous planning time, we still keep working on it with a faint hope which statistically yields very low results. Having said that, startups and stats don&#8217;t seem to marry very well too :) ..</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your thoughts above, I am sure it will add a wealth of experience for the readers in this discussion :) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SF		</title>
		<link>https://inspire99.com/it-often-takes-time-to-arrive-at-simple-elegant-solutions-startup-101/#comment-14053</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 06:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://inspire99.com/?p=13176#comment-14053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Today&#039;s quote and your analysis triggered a couple of thoughts from my own experiences in quite different settings. In the dim and distant past I developed projects that were not for profit and met social needs. I&#039;m thinking of community projects established independently or as part of my previous roles in government. All in the UK. They are not strictly comparable because there might involve the design of a service or activity but to further complicate matters elements of governance and accountability would also be required. I&#039;ve worked in all sectors (including international corporations and my own business) and firmly believe government, community and the &#039;voluntary&#039; sectors and the environment in which they work is by definition more difficult. Two inter-related things come to mind. First: we&#039;d often over plan or over engineer, make the solution too complex, that was too top heavy. we&#039;d set up committees, structures that were overblown, we thought it was necessary but I&#039;m not so sure. Secondly the development of the activity/service evolved and matured over time. Experience from its use and feedback from the community helps it evolve to become more effective and better suited to the end user. So not totally different to a commercial product. Stephen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s quote and your analysis triggered a couple of thoughts from my own experiences in quite different settings. In the dim and distant past I developed projects that were not for profit and met social needs. I&#8217;m thinking of community projects established independently or as part of my previous roles in government. All in the UK. They are not strictly comparable because there might involve the design of a service or activity but to further complicate matters elements of governance and accountability would also be required. I&#8217;ve worked in all sectors (including international corporations and my own business) and firmly believe government, community and the &#8216;voluntary&#8217; sectors and the environment in which they work is by definition more difficult. Two inter-related things come to mind. First: we&#8217;d often over plan or over engineer, make the solution too complex, that was too top heavy. we&#8217;d set up committees, structures that were overblown, we thought it was necessary but I&#8217;m not so sure. Secondly the development of the activity/service evolved and matured over time. Experience from its use and feedback from the community helps it evolve to become more effective and better suited to the end user. So not totally different to a commercial product. Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
